Two Movies Over Memorial Weekend
Unleashed
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/cba1f/cba1ff00c8f635ff65c0914fbc706b73a6168202" alt=""
Crash
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/91235/91235db803e931e930bba63c573eaad0980097eb" alt=""
Unleashed
Only $10/shirt! What great value! What great shirts! Go to the Threadless t-shirt sale; through June 6th only.
I felt lucky Friday night, lucky enough the snab the 2 round-trip tickets from Southwest at the Asian Employee Association's Scholarship Fundraising dinner. I wasn't that lucky, but I did win something from the raffle: "Martin Yang's Chinatown Cooking" and a Chinese placemat/napkin/chopsticks set. Unfortunately, Mr. Yang does not cover sizzling rice soup in his cookbook.
I slept late Wednesday night, and by the time I dragged myself out of bed Thursday morning and arrived late at work, I was not in the mood to later wait in line and watch what I knew was going to be a mediocre movie. Why, oh why had I already bought tickets for the 3:30 pm show on opening day?
Title: Bad Acts and Guilty Minds--Conundrums of the Criminal Law
A group of doctors was asked: "Imagine that the U.S. is preparing for the outbreak of an unusual Asian disease, which is expected to kill 600 people. Two alternative programs to combat the disease have been proposed. Assume that the exact scientific estimate of the consequences of the programs is as follows: If program A is adopted, 200 lives will be saved. If program B is adopted, there is 1/3 probability that 600 people will be saved, and 2/3 probability that no people will be saved. Which of the two programs do you favor?" The vast majority of the doctors, 72 percent of them, opted for program A.
Another group of doctors was given the same "cover story" as the first, but they were asked to choose among the following alternatives: "If program C is adopted, 400 people will die. If program D is adopted, there is 1/3 probability that nobody will die, and 2/3 probability that 600 people will die. Which of the two programs do you favor?" Only 22 percent of the doctors opted for C. The odd thing is that C is but a different way of phrasing A. If people's preferences among risks are so unreliable, is the notion of negligence workable?
Henri plans a trek through the desert. Alphonse, intending to kill Henri, puts poison into his canteen. Gaston also intends to kill Henri but has no idea what Alphonse has been up to. He punctures Henri's canteen, and Henri dies of thirst. Who has caused Henri's death? Was it Alphonse? Gaston? Both? Or neither?
My left arm is still sore from the tetanus shot, but it seemed much worse last night. I dreamt I got infected with the disease (I don't think you actually can--the shot contains no live bacteria) and lost my arm. I assume the pain I felt last night came from turning accidentally onto the affected area.
I drop my backpack to the floor, take off my jacket and lay it on top of the bag. I sit down in a chair, roll up my sleeve--
I can't post "cute" messages on my answering machine anymore. Gone are the days of Vader's breath, my songs, and "Hello? Hello? Just kidding."
For some reason, almost all conversations I overhear sound lame. And all morning radio talk shows are like overheard conversations, seemingly amusing to the people in the studio only. The morning commuters, like people stuck behind you in line or in a crowd, are the captive audience.
1. Anthony has escaped another American Idol elimination! I was so disappointed when Constantine had to go, but my hurt feelings have patched up now that Scott Savol is finally out of the picture. Go home, woman beater!
...or, rather, I'm just driving myself crazy.
I had thought in the back of my mind that "Angry Candy, Fragments of" had a new blog somewhere, but I just couldn't find that email/announcement. And now I've found it here.
You are an EXPERIMENTER (DIAT). Although you're slightly shy (admit it!), you love control. When a problem comes across your way, you stomp on it swiftly and decisively. You are bothered easily by failure in others and failure in yourself. You don't like people that you don't think are intelligent. Rather than arguing with them, however, you would just as soon ignore them altogether.
In relationships, you have a strong heart. And because you're introverted, people take you as someone they can trust. But the fact is that in addition to solving problems, you like to create them.
You're a good person at heart, but then again, who isn't?
Fragments of Angry Candy, I hope you post an opinion about this.
"More important" and "more importantly" are used as full-sentence modifiers, often in the initial position and treated parenthetically (set off with a comma). Either phrase can usually be translated as "what is more important."
More important, the armies in the east had used up all their supplies.
Many writers will use the adverb form, "importantly," thinking that the phrase modifies a verb in the main clause; usually, however, that is not the case. The phrase will almost invariably modify, adjectivally, the entire clause, and the adjective form, "important," will suffice. Burchfield says that "more importantly" was a despised construction during the 1970s and 80s, but that nowadays both phrases seem be used about equally and with equal acceptability.
Authority: The New Fowler's Modern English Usage edited by R.W. Burchfield. Clarendon Press: Oxford, England. 1996.
"More importantly, what will be written in God's book of remembrance?" There is no grammatical reason to avoid using "importantly" in this structure. Since the function of the phrase is adverbial (it modifies the proposition of the entire sentence, rather than modifying a noun), the form ending in -ly is the better choice. If anything, "more important" is the non-standard, informal choice. The only way it can be considered acceptable is if it is interpreted as a reduction of "what is more important...." This phrase is decidedly conversational, rather than formal and the reduction only increases the informality.
Authority: Ken Hyde, University of Delaware English Language Institute.
I've begun to read Allen Mandelbaum's translation and I'm hooked. Though I tend to love Ted Hughes's translations the most, he unfortunately only worked on parts of Ovid's book (Hughes's version is called "Tales from Ovid").